Canada’s Largest IPO Since 2000: Is PrairieSky a Better Bet Than EnCana?

EnCana just completed the largest IPO in Canada since 2000 for its subsidiary, PrairieSky, Which company is a better investment?

The Motley Fool

Once-troubled Canadian oil and gas producer EnCana (TSX: ECA)(NYSE: ECA) continues to go from strength to strength under the guidance of CEO Doug Suttle. Not only is the company’s turnaround strategy gaining traction, as evidenced by a solid operational performance for the first quarter of 2014, but it has just successfully completed the largest IPO in Canada since 2000.

How did the IPO fare?

The IPO offered 52 million common shares of PrairieSky Royalty (TSX: PSK), a corporation holding Encana’s mineral title land assets. Even more impressively, Encana was able to garner sufficient interest in the IPO for it to obtain the top-end price for the shares of $28 each. EnCana raised $1.46 billion from this IPO, leaving it with a controlling interest of 60% in PrairieSky.

PrairieSky’s focus will not be to develop the assets itself, but rather to attract third-party capital investments to develop the oil and gas properties it holds. It was previously projected by EnCana that the assets sold to PrairieSky would have generated $195 million in free cash flow and $165 million in dividends in 2013 had the business been an independent company.

There are a number of advantages to operating a royalty company, a key one being the ability to generate a higher operating margin per barrel of crude produced than an oil producer with lower downside risks. This is because the royalty company does not need to invest capital in developing the assets, and is also not responsible for abandonment or environmental liabilities. These risks are carried by the operators, who commit to investing in and developing the oil assets held by the royalty company.

Even more importantly, 97% of the property assets containing oil and natural gas held by PrairieSky are fee simple mineral title, meaning there are no royalties payable to the Crown and that the assets are held by PrairieSky in perpetuity.

EnCana vs. PrairieSky

With all of these advantages compared to Crown and freehold title lands, which is the better investment: EnCana or PrairieSky?

EnCana’s shares have performed strongly over the last year, spiking a healthy 16% in that period. But the company’s renewed focus on growing higher-margin oil and natural gas liquids production while also divesting itself of non-core and lower-margin dry gas assets should continue to improve its financial performance.

In the first quarter of 2014 alone, EnCana’s oil and natural gas liquids production grew a healthy 3% compared to the previous quarter, and a whopping 56% compared to the equivalent quarter in 2013. The company has also committed to growing liquids production by 30% as a key part in its turnaround strategy.

EnCana holds some significant high-quality oil and gas assets in Canada, including being the largest operator in liquids-rich Montney, one of Canada’s most economic natural gas plays. Its acquisition of oil- and liquids-rich land in the prolific Eagle Ford Shale also bodes well for EnCana to realize its goal of significantly boosting its higher-margin crude and liquids production.

The proceeds raised by EnCana from the IPO can also be directed towards strengthening its balance sheet and further developing what management considers to be core assets. Thus, EnCana should see a significant leap in its operational and financial performance.

Overall, PrairieSky is an appealing investment. But with EnCana retaining a 60% controlling stake and showing signs that its turnaround strategy will be successful, investors can benefit from both if they invest in EnCana.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt Smith does not own shares of any companies mentioned.

More on Investing

3 colorful arrows racing straight up on a black background.
Investing

3 No-Brainer TSX Stocks Under $50

Amid buoyant markets and improving optimism, these three under-$50 Canadian stocks are poised to earn superior returns in the long…

Read more »

jar with coins and plant
Dividend Stocks

2 High-Yield Dividend Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for a Decade

These TSX stocks still offer attractive dividend yields.

Read more »

oil pump jack under night sky
Energy Stocks

Oil Price Outlook for 2025, Plus Smart Energy Stocks

If you are looking to buy some energy stocks now or next year, it's essential to consider the oil price…

Read more »

Data center servers IT workers
Tech Stocks

2 Things to Know About Dye & Durham Stock Before You Buy

Dye & Durham stock has given some good returns to those who bought the dip. Is the stock still a…

Read more »

Paper Canadian currency of various denominations
Metals and Mining Stocks

This Billionaire Is Selling Micron and Picking up This TSX Stock

Prem Watsa may have sold some Micron, but he's putting the funds towards something with even more growth potential.

Read more »

Piggy bank in autumn leaves
Stocks for Beginners

Bank of Montreal vs. RBC: Which Canadian Bank Stock is the Better Buy?

Both of these banks have a strong reason to claim the top choice, but when it comes down to it,…

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

3 Mid-Cap Canadian Stocks That Offer Reliable Dividends

While blue-chip, large-cap stocks are the preferred choice for most conservative dividend investors, there are some solid picks in the…

Read more »

concept of real estate evaluation
Dividend Stocks

Invest $23,253 in This Stock for $110 in Monthly Passive Income

Dividend investors don’t need substantial capital to earn monthly passive income streams from an established dividend grower.

Read more »