Should You Buy First Quantum Minerals Limited or Teck Resources Ltd.?

Picking a good mining investment right now is a daunting task. Here we compare and contrast First Quantum Minerals Limited (TSX:FM) and Teck Resources Ltd. (TSX:TCK.B)(NYSE:TCK). Should you buy either?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

Right now isn’t the best time for the miners. Low commodity prices across the board are impacting these companies’ bottom lines, but are there any good investment picks in the sector? Lets take a look at First Quantum Minerals Limited (TSX:FM) and Teck Resources Ltd. (TSX:TCK.B)(NYSE:TCK) to see if an investment in either stock makes sense.

First Quantum Minerals

First Quantum Minerals’ primary asset is copper, but the company also has exposure to nickel, gold, zinc, and platinum group elements. The company recently posted its Q4 2014 earnings, and to much surprise, it beat analysts’ expectations on profit, thanks to increased copper output and lower production costs.

Teck Resources

Teck is Canada’s largest diversified miner, but its main asset is metallurgical coal. Teck’s other assets include copper, zinc, and energy.

Who has the best products?

Primary commodities for both companies are seeing tough times right now, but the long-term forecast for each product is promising. It’s a tough pick to choose between the most promising commodities (metallurgical coal or copper), but if you are hedging your bets on the company with the best commodities, I like the fact that First Quantum has both base and precious metals. Teck’s exposure to energy and base metals is a bit of a drawback.

Track records

Teck Resources is having a good year so far, with the stock up almost 9% since the first trading day of 2015. However, if you look at the long-term performance, the company has consistently disappointed its shareholders, with the stock down 59% in the last five years and 24% in the past 10 years.

Teck Resources is suffering from low prices for most of the commodities it produces, yet the stock still has experienced some recent strength. A great deal of this strength is being attributed to a lower Canadian dollar, which makes the company’s Canadian operations more profitable. In addition, the company has been effective in some recent cost-cutting measures, which have enhanced profitability.

First Quantum Minerals is down almost 9% this year and down 12% in the last five years, but up an astonishing 215% in the last 10 years. Clearly, the company is experiencing some near-term weakness, which can be attributed to a weak copper market and operational challenges that the company is facing.

Financials

Teck’s 2014 full-year results were mixed. Gross profit before depreciation and amortization was $2.9 billion compared with $3.7 billion in the prior year. The big positive was that the company closed the year with a cash balance of $2.0 billion.

First Quantum’s latest results were surprisingly positive. The concerning thing here is the company is over-leveraged with a large amount of debt.

Who should you buy?

In this situation it really is a toss-up. For Teck Resources, improving near-term financials and solid operating results are a positive. But concerns circulate around the fact that the company has consistently underperformed across a variety of economic climates.

On the other hand, First Quantum Minerals’ most recent results were inconsistent, and the company’s stock hit a five-year low early in the year due to concerns about taxation in its Zambian operations. While earnings were mixed, the main concern I have when it comes to First Quantum is the company’s rising debt. Rising debt in a low-price environment can be disastrous.

In the end, choosing one the two companies to buy is a hard choice. I’m more inclined to sit out of both stocks for now.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Leia Klingel has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Train cars pass over trestle bridge in the mountains
Dividend Stocks

Is CNR Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

Can CNR stock continue its long-term outperformance into 2025 and beyond? Let's explore whether now is a good time to…

Read more »

engineer at wind farm
Energy Stocks

Invest $20,000 in This Dividend Stock for $100 in Monthly Passive Income

This dividend stock has it all – a strong outlook, monthly income, and even more to consider buying today.

Read more »

Hourglass and stock price chart
Stock Market

It’s Not Too Late: Invest in These TSX Growth Stocks Now

Solid fundamentals of these top TSX growth stocks could help them maintain strong upward momentum in the years to come.

Read more »

coins jump into piggy bank
Dividend Stocks

The Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy With $500 Right Now

These top dividend stocks both offer attractive yields and trade off their highs, making them two of the best to…

Read more »

stocks climbing green bull market
Stocks for Beginners

3 TSX Stocks Soaring Higher With No Signs of Slowing

Don't ignore stocks just because they look like they're at a high price. Instead, see exactly why they've driven so…

Read more »

dividends can compound over time
Bank Stocks

Is TD Bank Stock a Buy for Its 5.2% Dividend Yield?

TD Bank stock offers a rare 5.2% dividend yield—can it rebound from challenges and reward contrarian investors? Here's what to…

Read more »

chart reflected in eyeglass lenses
Investing

How Should a Beginner Invest in Stocks? Start With This Index Fund

This Vanguard index fund is the perfect way to start a Canadian investment portfolio.

Read more »

analyze data
Bank Stocks

Is BMO Stock a Buy for its 4.7% Dividend Yield?

Bank of Montreal is up 20% since late August. Are more gains on the way?

Read more »