The “Profoundly Serious” Problem That May Be Lurking in Your Mutual Funds

The Cumming’s Report might be the final nail in the coffin for mutual fund trailer commissions.

The Motley Fool

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Around the world, mutual fund trailer commissions (aka trailer fees) are beginning to be phased out, notably in the U.K. and Australia. Until recently, they seemed entrenched in the Canadian market—but it appears the dam is about to break even here.

It turns out the final nail in the coffin for trailer commissions may be a report for the Canadian Securities Administrators written by Schulich School of Business finance professor Douglas Cumming.

In a recent article in Investment Executive, Neil Gross, executive director for the Canadian Foundation for Advancement of Investor Rights (FAIR), noted that despite rising evidence to the contrary, “the investment industry has persistently refused to acknowledge that trailing commissions harm investors.”

But that refusal is now a moot point because the research gathered by Cumming and two colleagues over more than 10 years is pretty definitive, if not damning. The 43 mutual fund companies they scrutinized account for some two-thirds of all mutual fund assets under management in Canada.

Cumming focused on three points that are what critics have been assuming all along:

  1. Mutual funds that don’t pay trailer commissions may manage to receive some inflows from investors as long as well as the funds do well and will lose inflows if they don’t perform well. Sadly, however, if funds pay advisors trailer commissions, investment inflows will continue into the funds even if their performance is poor.
  1. This so-called gravitational effect becomes even more pronounced for funds that pay higher trailers.
  1. If funds keep attracting investment inflows without having to generate strong performance, their performance will deteriorate further over time, particularly in funds that pay trailers.

This matters—a lot

The result is hardly a victimless crime. As Gross puts it, “trailers warp investment flows by letting something other than what’s best for the investor drive sales, and this channels many investors toward suboptimal funds. Trailers also harm investors, and the market as a whole, by facilitating deteriorations in fund performance. These are profoundly serious findings.”

This comes as no surprise to the consumer advocates who have been warning of just these trends since well before the Stromberg Report was delivered to the Ontario Securities Commission in 1995. I’m thinking of voices in the wilderness like the Frugal Bugle’s Joe Killoran, whose monomaniacal zeal about the perils of trailers unfortunately caused many to stop listening to the warning. Those who did listen long ago fled mutual funds and their high fees and switched to index funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs), often purchased at discount brokerages.

Conflicts of interest

But for the many folks still in mutual funds, trailers continue to create obvious conflicts of interest: as the cynics put it, they warp the client/advisory playing field, so that in effect the advisor is looking after his or her own retirement as much or more than he/she is looking out for the best interests of the client.

When you consider that investors are paying for what should be objective advice that’s in their best interests, the case against trailers is pretty compelling. Investors end up unknowingly paying high costs for product recommendations that are compromised.

It’s little wonder that trailers have already been banned in a handful of countries. Cumming’s findings prove trailers are contrary to the public interest and Gross says “they ought to be banned in Canada as they have been in the U.K., Australia, and elsewhere.”

While many thoughtful investment professionals are beginning to concede this, Gross warns that those who continue to oppose the ban of trailers will “look avaricious, biased and unprofessional. … From this point onward opposing a ban will make the opponent appear unfit to be an advisor, destroying their entire value proposition.”

Still, many industry people will continue to be blind to this

There’s an old saying that those whose livelihoods come from a particular activity tend to be blinded by it. Gross sites one such weak argument that banning trailers could trigger a so-called advice gap that will cause smaller investors to lose access to investment advice altogether.

Indeed, the industry group Advocis made a variant of this argument in a recent blog for my own Financial Independence Hub. Supposedly, small investors can’t afford to pay for advice. Gross responds that this is self-contradictory—and that it’s unlikely that small investors currently receive significant amounts of advice in the first place, so there’s little to lose. And finally, and most tellingly, he notes that “an advice gap will arise only if the investment industry fails to innovate and develop new ways to serve small investors.”

But innovation is already happening, as we’ve seen with robo-advisors, which are often built on the same ETFs that do-it-yourself investors purchase directly. A big focus of robo-advisors is millennials with only small amounts of money to invest (less than $50,000).

From what I’ve seen, the basic robo-advice on ETF selection and monitoring, asset allocation, and rebalancing is quite appropriate for those investors and comes at a much lower cost than mutual funds and their trailer commissions.

In other words, ETFs and robo-services are the future. Mutual fund trailers are the past. Even if they’re not banned outright, investors will—and should—continue to vote them off the island.

Should you invest $1,000 in CIBC right now?

Before you buy stock in CIBC, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor Canada analyst team just identified what they believe are the Top Stocks for 2025 and Beyond for investors to buy now… and CIBC wasn’t one of them. The Top Stocks that made the cut could potentially produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider MercadoLibre, which we first recommended on January 8, 2014 ... if you invested $1,000 in the “eBay of Latin America” at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $21,345.77!*

Stock Advisor Canada provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month – one from Canada and one from the U.S. The Stock Advisor Canada service has outperformed the return of S&P/TSX Composite Index by 24 percentage points since 2013*.

See the Top Stocks * Returns as of 4/21/25

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Jonathan Chevreau is founder of the Financial Independence Hub and can be reached at jonathan@findependencehub.com

Confidently Navigate Market Volatility: Claim Your Free Report!

Feeling uneasy about the ups and downs of the stock market lately? You’re not alone. At The Motley Fool Canada, we get it — and we’re here to help. We’ve crafted an essential guide designed to help you through these uncertain times: "5-Step Checklist: How to Prepare Your Portfolio for Volatility."

Don't miss out on this opportunity for peace of mind. Just click below to learn how to receive your complimentary report today!

Get Our Free Report Today

More on Investing

senior relaxes in hammock with e-book
Dividend Stocks

How I’d Invest $8,200 in Canadian Monthly Dividend Stocks to Pay for My Retirement Lifestyle

If you have some cash on hand, then these monthly dividend stocks can provide you with cash for life.

Read more »

protect, safe, trust
Investing

Protecting a $5,000 Investment: Why I’m Considering These 3 Defensive Stocks

These three top Canadian value stocks look well-positioned to provide portfolio stability and long-term upside for those navigating market turmoil.

Read more »

Canada national flag waving in wind on clear day
Investing

Where I’d Find Value in Canadian Stocks for My Long-Term Holdings

For investors seeking meaningful value (and long-term upside) from top Canadian stocks, here are two great examples to dive into…

Read more »

Circuit board with glowing lines
Tech Stocks

Got $1,500? How I’d Allocate it Between 2 Tech Stocks for Decades of Potential Growth

Are you looking to put $1,500 to work? These two Canadian tech stocks are a great place to start.

Read more »

man is enthralled with a movie in a theater
Investing

Is Now a Good Time to Buy Cineplex?

The decision of whether it's a good time to buy Cineplex has confounded investors since the pandemic, but It may…

Read more »

TFSA (Tax free savings account) acronym on wooden cubes on the background of stacks of coins
Investing

Why I’d Consider These 3 TSX Stocks Under $100 for my $7,000 TFSA Contribution

Here are three top TSX stocks I think long-term investors would do well to own in their TFSAs during this…

Read more »

Blocks conceptualizing Canada's Tax Free Savings Account
Dividend Stocks

Here’s Exactly How $20,000 in a TFSA Could Grow to $300,000

Can you grow $20,000 into $300,000 by holding the iShares S&P/TSX Index Fund (TSX:XIC) in a TFSA?

Read more »

Blocks conceptualizing the Registered Retirement Savings Plan
Retirement

Top Canadian Value Stocks I’d Buy for My RRSP and Hold Through Retirement

If you're looking for strength in your RRSP, then look for value in long-term holds.

Read more »