Will 2017 Be Suncor Energy Inc.’s Best Year Yet?

Thanks to recent acquisitions and the upcoming completion of two major projects, Suncor Energy Inc. (TSX:SU)(NYSE:SU) expects to deliver record production in 2017.

| More on:
The Motley Fool

While it has yet to release final 2016 numbers, last year turned out to be an excellent one for Suncor Energy Inc. (TSX:SU)(NYSE:SU). While many of its financial metrics were well off the all-time highs set before the crash in crude prices, some of the company’s operating metrics were at record levels.

During the third quarter, for example, the company pushed oil sands operating costs to near decade lows while delivering record refinery throughput and daily production. Because of these factors, one could make the case that last year was one of the company’s best. That said, 2017 could be even better. Here’s why.

Production continues to march higher

Suncor entered 2016 expecting to produce between 525,000 and 565,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (BOE/d). That represented a slight decline from the prior year due in part to several significant planned maintenance activities it had on the docket. However, the company revised that number upwards more than once, expecting to produce an average of 610,000-625,000 BOE/d during the year. Higher production was fueled by the company’s successful acquisition strategy, whereby it increased its stake in the Syncrude oil sands facility by an additional 41.74% in two transactions.

Suncor expects its production to rise even higher this year; initial expectations are that output will be in the range of 680,000-720,000 BOE/d. At the midpoint, that is 13% higher than last year and represents a new record.

Another driver of the year-over-year increase is the expected completion of the Fort Hills and Hebron projects by year-end. After investing billions of dollars in these projects over the past couple of years, Suncor will finally see a return on those investments; the ramp up from those projects will set the company up to deliver even higher production in 2018.

Cash flow should rebound

One of Suncor’s other major success stories last year was the ability to drive down operating costs. Through the third quarter, oil sands operating costs were $27.15 per barrel, while costs at Syncrude were $38.85 per barrel. Those numbers represent a significant improvement from prior years; oil sands operating costs were down nearly $10 per barrel since 2013, while Syncrude’s costs were down more than $9 per barrel from its peak in 2014.

The company sees even further improvements coming this year with expectations that oil sands operating costs will average $24-27 per barrel, which, at the midpoint, is a 37% reduction since 2011. Meanwhile, the company sees Syncrude’s costs falling to $32-34 per barrel this year, which would be its lowest level in several years.

These lower costs combined with rising production and stable oil prices in the low $50s would enable Suncor to produce roughly $8 billion in cash flow from operations this year. That is up from an estimated $6 billion last year when oil averaged $43 per barrel, though it is well below the $9.4 billion it produced in 2013 when crude averaged nearly $98 per barrel.

That said, given its lower costs and rising output, Suncor will not need a return of near-triple-digit oil to generate cash flow above 2013’s level. However, it is highly unlikely that oil will rise enough this year set a new record.

Investor takeaway

This year should be Suncor’s best ever for production thanks to recent acquisitions and upcoming project completions. That said, given current oil-price expectations, the company probably will not set a new record for cash flow.

However, it is not as far away from that peak as it used to be thanks to the significant improvement in its costs and production. In fact, given its upcoming project completions, the company could set a record as early as 2018 if commodity prices cooperate.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt DiLallo has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

oil pump jack under night sky
Energy Stocks

Canadian Oil and Gas Stocks to Watch for 2025

Natural gas producer Tourmaline stands to benefit from a rise in natural gas prices as LNG Canada begins operation.

Read more »

TFSA (Tax-Free Savings Account) on wooden blocks and Canadian one hundred dollar bills.
Energy Stocks

Your Blueprint to Build a 6-Figure TFSA

Know the blueprint or near-perfect strategy on how to build and achieve a 6-figure TFSA.

Read more »

oil and gas pipeline
Energy Stocks

Enbridge: Buy, Sell, or Hold in 2025?

Enbridge is up 30% in the past six months. Are more gains on the way?

Read more »

oil pump jack under night sky
Energy Stocks

Canadian Natural Resources: Buy, Sell, or Hold in 2025?

CNRL is moving higher to start 2025. Are more gains on the way?

Read more »

Income and growth financial chart
Energy Stocks

The Ultimate Growth Stock to Buy With $500 Right Now

This high-growth stock can deliver strong investor returns through price appreciation and dividend income.

Read more »

data analyze research
Energy Stocks

If I Could Only Buy and Hold a Single Stock, This Would Be it

Do you want a great stock you can buy and hold? Here's my top pick to consider buying that is…

Read more »

ways to boost income
Energy Stocks

2 Absurdly Undervalued TSX Stocks I’d Buy Today

Discover why Magellan Aerospace and Total Energy Services are two incredibly undervalued TSX stocks that savvy investors shouldn't ignore.

Read more »

oil and gas pipeline
Energy Stocks

TC Energy: Buy, Sell, or Hold in 2025?

TC Energy enjoyed a big rally in 2024. Are more gains on the way?

Read more »