Wajax Corp. Is a Great Example of Why the Leverage Ratio Matters

Wajax Corp. (TSX:WJX) and its 4.8% dividend yield is awfully tempting, but before you buy its stock, it’s important that investors understand why the leverage ratio matters.

| More on:

I recently read an investment newsletter that recommended Wajax Corp. (TSX:WJX) stock and its hefty 4.8% dividend yield; it’s thesis suggested that its current restructuring plan has returned the heavy equipment sales and rental company to profitability, thus making its stock a buy.

Certainly, Wajax, like a lot of businesses dealing with the energy sector, has taken it on the chin the past couple of years as a result of falling oil prices.

It’s this setback that forced CEO Mark Foote to implement its restructuring plan, which was announced on March 1, 2016, and would see the company move from three separately operated business segments (Equipment, Power Systems, Industrial Components) to one cohesive unit with a sales division and a rental division servicing all three former units in an effort to make it a leaner organization.

On an annualized basis, Wajax expects to generate $17 million in permanent savings in 2017 and beyond. That’s about $0.85 per share, which goes a long way to delivering it back to its formerly profitable ways.

What’s not to like?

As a result of the 2016 cost savings, Wajax reported GAAP earnings of $0.55 per share in 2016 — considerably better than the $0.59 loss a year earlier. Trading at 14.5 times its estimated 2017 earnings of $1.46 per share and 12.2 times its 2018 earnings of $1.73 per share, a 4.8% yield seems pretty inviting; a rebound in the oil and gas industry would certainly add to that.

That’s the positive side of this small-cap coin.

However, before you buy its stock, you’ll want to look more closely at its debt situation and leverage ratio before committing your hard-earned dollars to Wajax stock. Here’s why.

The leverage ratio is generally defined as net debt divided by EBITDA; Wajax defines it as debt (including letters of credit) divided by adjusted EBITDA. Every company does it slightly differently. The important thing is that you remember to define it the same way whether you’re comparing two companies or two separate periods of time for a single company.

So, let’s consider Wajax’s leverage ratio at the end of 2016.

It finished fiscal 2016 with total debt of $132.4 million and adjusted EBITDA of $64 for a leverage ratio of 2.07. Now, let’s consider its leverage ratio from five years ago. It finished fiscal 2011 with a leverage ratio of 0.7, or about two-thirds its 2016 ratio. That means it was relying far less on debt to operate and grow its business back in 2011 than it is today.

Because Wajax is just returning to profitability, it’s more useful to compare its price-to-sales (P/S) ratio in both years. Currently, Wajax has a P/S of 0.3; in 2011, it was 0.5. However, five years ago, Wajax was generating more EBITDA profit from less debt; not to mention stocks generally weren’t nearly as overpriced as they are today.

In 2012, you could have bought Wajax stock with a dividend yield higher than 7%, despite it trading at an all-time high of $53.43. Today, you’d get one-third less the yield at a much greater risk because of the extra debt.

Whether you’re considering a small-cap stock like Wajax or a big company such as BCE Inc. (TSX:BCE)(NYSE:BCE), it pays to compare the leverage ratio at different times in a company’s history to see if you are undertaking too much risk for the reward.

In the case of Wajax, I believe you are.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Will Ashworth has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Train cars pass over trestle bridge in the mountains
Dividend Stocks

Is CNR Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

Can CNR stock continue its long-term outperformance into 2025 and beyond? Let's explore whether now is a good time to…

Read more »

engineer at wind farm
Energy Stocks

Invest $20,000 in This Dividend Stock for $100 in Monthly Passive Income

This dividend stock has it all – a strong outlook, monthly income, and even more to consider buying today.

Read more »

Hourglass and stock price chart
Stock Market

It’s Not Too Late: Invest in These TSX Growth Stocks Now

Solid fundamentals of these top TSX growth stocks could help them maintain strong upward momentum in the years to come.

Read more »

coins jump into piggy bank
Dividend Stocks

The Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy With $500 Right Now

These top dividend stocks both offer attractive yields and trade off their highs, making them two of the best to…

Read more »

stocks climbing green bull market
Stocks for Beginners

3 TSX Stocks Soaring Higher With No Signs of Slowing

Don't ignore stocks just because they look like they're at a high price. Instead, see exactly why they've driven so…

Read more »

dividends can compound over time
Bank Stocks

Is TD Bank Stock a Buy for Its 5.2% Dividend Yield?

TD Bank stock offers a rare 5.2% dividend yield—can it rebound from challenges and reward contrarian investors? Here's what to…

Read more »

chart reflected in eyeglass lenses
Investing

How Should a Beginner Invest in Stocks? Start With This Index Fund

This Vanguard index fund is the perfect way to start a Canadian investment portfolio.

Read more »

analyze data
Bank Stocks

Is BMO Stock a Buy for its 4.7% Dividend Yield?

Bank of Montreal is up 20% since late August. Are more gains on the way?

Read more »