History Suggests Now Might Be the Time to Buy Alaris Royalty Corp.

Alaris Royalty Corp. (TSX:AD) delivered bad news in its Q3 2017 earnings. Naturally, its stock got pummeled. Don’t let that scare you away. Here’s why.

| More on:
time is money compounding

Alaris Royalty Corp. (TSX:AD) announced its third-quarter earnings November 6. Included in the news was a $41 million impairment charge on its preferred-share investment in Group SM, a Montreal-based engineering and project-management company that’s run into financial problems over the last two years.

Investors never like to see the word “impairment” in an earnings release, but when it effectively reduces the likelihood of recovering any funds from your partner, in this case Group SM, it’s an especially sombre day.

Already down 11% on the year prior to announcing the impairment, the stock has since lost another 7% and is trading perilously close to its five-year low of $18.20. Alaris hasn’t traded this low since May 2012.

Time to run for the hills, right? Not so fast.

Before you write off Alaris, I thought I’d go back to 2012 to understand its valuation then compared to now and why it had the same share price as today, despite being a much smaller company both in terms of revenues and earnings.

By the end, I think I’ll have my answer.

Q3 2017 vs. Q3 2012

To get a snapshot of the two periods, I’ve put together a table with key numbers from the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.

Key Numbers

Q1-Q3 2017

Q1-Q3 2012

Total Assets

$751.5M

$285.7M

Total Debt

$115.1M

$1.9M

Book Value

$600.2M

$279.7M

Book Value / Share

$16.35

$12.27

Total Revenue

$94.5M

$23.1M

Normalized EBITDA

$58.0M

$18.0M

Normalized EBITDA / Share

$1.59

$0.79

Capitalization structure has changed

Back in 2012, Alaris was financed primarily from equity and just $2 million in debt. Today, its debt accounts for 15.8% of its total capitalization — a very low leverage ratio, despite an almost three-fold increase in assets.

Despite a 7% decrease in its third-quarter normalized EBITDA to $1.59 from $1.71, it’s still grown by 14.9% annually since 2012.

So, despite the bad news about Group SM, Alaris is miles ahead of where it was in 2012, and yet investors back then were willing to pay almost 18 times normalized EBITDA compared to just nine times normalized EBITDA today.

What am I missing?

Another thing to keep in mind when comparing the two years is how many partner companies Alaris had in each period. In 2012, it had 10 partners at the end of the fiscal year. As of the end of September, it had 13 partners with a number of successful exits having taking place in both 2016 and 2017.

One of those successful exits happened in Q3 2017, delivering a 29% internal rate of return for shareholders from the redemption of its units in Sequel Youth and Family Services, LLC, a company that wasn’t even a partner until July 2013, when Alaris contributed US$66 million and another US$7.5 million a year later.

In addition, Alaris made its biggest investment yet in the third quarter, contributing US$85 million to Sales Benchmark Index, LLC, a sales and marketing consultancy in the U.S. that will deliver US$11.1 million in annual distributions.

Bottom line

From every angle, Alaris is a better company than it was five years ago. If you focus on the payout ratio, I guarantee you won’t be impressed. However, if you focus on the big picture and its cash flow five years from now, just as investors would have done back in 2012, I think you’ll see a much more positive vision of the future.

That’s why now just might be the best time to buy Alaris stock. Be greedy when others are fearful.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Will Ashworth has no position in any stocks mentioned.   

More on Dividend Stocks

hand stacks coins
Dividend Stocks

3 Ultra-High-Yield Dividend Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for a Decade

These three high-yield dividend stocks still have some work to do, but each are in steady areas that are only…

Read more »

senior man and woman stretch their legs on yoga mats outside
Dividend Stocks

TFSA: 2 Canadian Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever

Here are 2 TFSA-worthy Canadian stocks. Which one is a good buy for your TFSA today?

Read more »

calculate and analyze stock
Dividend Stocks

This 5.5% Dividend Stock Pays Cash Every Single Month!

This REIT may offer monthly dividends, but don't forget about the potential returns in the growth industry its involved with.

Read more »

Silver coins fall into a piggy bank.
Dividend Stocks

How to Use Your TFSA to Earn up to $6,000 Per Year in Tax-Free Passive Income

A high return doesn't mean you have to make a high investment -- or a risky one -- especially with…

Read more »

path road success business
Dividend Stocks

2 High-Yield Dividend Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist and 1 to Avoid

High yields are great and all, but only if returns come with them. And while two of these might, another…

Read more »

Man holds Canadian dollars in differing amounts
Dividend Stocks

This 7% Dividend Stock Pays Cash Every Month

A high dividend yield isn't everything. But when it pays out each month and offers this stability, it's worth considering!

Read more »

young people stare at smartphones
Dividend Stocks

GST/HST “Vacation”: Everything Canadians Need to Know

The GST/HST "vacation" is a little treat for the holidays, along with a $250 payment. What should you do with…

Read more »

Train cars pass over trestle bridge in the mountains
Dividend Stocks

Is CNR Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

Can CNR stock continue its long-term outperformance into 2025 and beyond? Let's explore whether now is a good time to…

Read more »