Is Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX:QSR) a Buy at $78?

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX:QSR)(NYSE:QSR) delivered good earnings in Q2 2018. Should you be buying?

| More on:

The one thing I’ve learned about 3G Capital disciples is that they are very good at delivering increased profits to the bottom line.

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX:QSR)(NYSE:QSR) CEO Daniel Schwartz proved this point in the second quarter, wringing a 29.3% year-over-year increase in adjusted net income from a 1% increase in sales.

Forget the fact that it’s having a heck of a time growing the top line; investors only care about the bottom line — and judging by the company’s latest results, it could be the catalyst that moves QSR stock to $100 before the end of the year.

So, is it a buy at $78?

You’re probably wondering how I came up with $78 given that it’s currently trading around $81.50 as I write this, and it hit a 2018 high of $85.71 as recently as July 24.

Well, Fool contributor Kay Ng evaluated Restaurant Brands’ second-quarter results August 2, concluding that a good entry point for new investors would be when its dividend yields 3%. Currently paying US$0.45 per quarter, that works out to $2.36 Canadian on an annualized basis. A 3% yield works out to approximately $78.

So, here we are wondering if Restaurant Brands is a buy at $78.

The case for $78

It’s a given that my colleague believes QSR stock is worth buying at $78. She’s not alone.

In July, Ambrose O’Callaghan, while not opining on the intrinsic value of Restaurant Brands’ stock, did paint a relatively positive picture of the company in the year ahead.

RBI has worked to address challenges at Tim Hortons with its ambitious investment plan, which was unveiled last quarter,” O’Callaghan wrote July 26. “Results have improved at Popeyes, and Burger King’s performance has been consistently excellent. I’d like RBI to overcome its issues at Tim Hortons over the next year.”

While I’m not a mind reader, my guess is that O’Callaghan would likely argue that its stock would head higher over the remaining four months of the year; not lower, but that’s merely speculation.

Finally, Fool contributor Kris Knutson argued in mid-July that Restaurant Brands was a great long-term hold for your TFSA. At the time of the article, QSR was trading around $83.

As any financial professional will tell you, capital gains aren’t taxable in the tax-free account; thus, you’re wise to only include stocks that will go up in price over the long haul because you can’t use tax losses to offset capital gains.

He’s not specifically saying it’s a buy at $78. However, it’s safe to say it’s an implied buy at that price.

The case against $78

In early July, I took the opposite position to Fool contributor Chris MacDonald’s assertion that QSR stock would hit $100 by the end of the year, arguing that it wouldn’t because it was already an expensive stock based on most financial metrics along with the fact that it carries way too much debt on its balance sheet.

Looking at the company’s second-quarter sales numbers, I see a Tim Hortons’ two-year comp of -0.4%; Burger King’s two-year comp is 2.9%, and Popeyes’ two-year comp is 0.1%– hardly the stuff of legends.

And while Restaurant Brands might have increased its adjusted net income by almost 30% in the second quarter, it managed to reduce its net debt by just $100 million in the quarter because of significantly lower cash flow in the first half of the year.

Whether we’re talking about its expansion of the Tim Hortons’ brand in China or its ability to resolve the issues with its franchisees on both sides of the border, I’m skeptical about this company.

I’m just not convinced that Restaurant Brands is the real deal–and its mediocre comps back me up.

QSR stock’s true value

Intrinsic value is impossible to nail down. While I don’t think it will get to $100 by the end of the year, I also don’t think it’s about to slide into the $60s.

Is it worth $78?

I’m not about to buy QSR stock to find out, but feel free to go ahead and find out for me.

Fool contributor Will Ashworth has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC.

More on Investing

workers walk through an office building
Stocks for Beginners

2 Global Financial Giants That Add Geographic Diversification

UBS and HSBC can help Canadians diversify beyond domestic banks by adding global wealth management and Asia-linked trade finance exposure.

Read more »

Blocks conceptualizing Canada's Tax Free Savings Account
Dividend Stocks

How to Use a TFSA to Earn $500 a Month — Completely Tax-Free

Earn $500 a month tax‑free by using a TFSA and three monthly paying REITs that deliver reliable, diversified passive income…

Read more »

Hourglass projecting a dollar sign as shadow
Dividend Stocks

My Top Canadian Dividend Stocks You’ll Want to Own Forever

CN Rail (TSX:CNR) and Enbridge (TSX:ENB) are great blue chips worth holding forever for all that dividend growth.

Read more »

tsx today
Stock Market

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Tuesday, April 7

The TSX extended its gains to a fourth session, while today’s trade could stay cautious amid surging oil prices and…

Read more »

Stocks for Beginners

1 Cheap Canadian Stock Down 66% to Buy and Hold

Air Canada is down hard from its highs, but the business is still throwing off cash and guiding to higher…

Read more »

Piggy bank and Canadian coins
Dividend Stocks

When Does a Taxable Account Actually Beat a TFSA? Here’s the Answer

Here’s a surprising scenario wherein a taxable account could beat your TFSA.

Read more »

dancer in front of lights brings excitement and heat
Dividend Stocks

2 Canadian Stocks That Look Ready to Break Out This Year

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSX:ATD) stock is a good one to hold in a volatile market.

Read more »

Nurse uses stethoscope to listen to a girl's heartbeat
Dividend Stocks

A 7% Dividend Stock Paying Out Monthly

Diversified Royalty turns a basket of consumer brands into a steady monthly cheque, and that’s exactly what income investors crave.

Read more »