Will Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (TSX:CNQ) Go to $0 in 10 Years?

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (TSX:CNQ)(NYSE:CNQ) is facing a difficult decade, which could force many of its prized properties to go bust.

| More on:

On January 9, Chevron and Occidental Petroleum invested in a Canadian company called Carbon Engineering, which makes technology that removes greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide directly from the air. The idea is to convert atmospheric gases into substances that can aid in enhanced oil recovery.

“It’s not sufficient to reduce emissions,” says Carbon Engineering CEO Steve Oldham. “We have to start removing the CO2 we’ve already put in the atmosphere.”

While this goal seems altruistic, it’s largely driven by the fear of diminishing profits. If regulation regarding emissions increases, rising costs could render huge projects economically nonviable. One of Carbon Engineering’s earliest investors, Canadian Natural Resources (TSX:CNQ)(NYSE:CNQ), knows this risk firsthand.

While many investors applauded the company’s investment in cutting-edge carbon-capture technology, the deal could be an admission of failure. Over the next decade, Canadian Natural could see large swaths of its production go bust.

Canadian Natural is facing extinction

Most of Canadian Natural’s production comes from oil sands facilities. These types of properties have always been controversial, mainly for environmental reasons, but poor economics were always bound to catch up with the company.

Production from oil sands is problematic in several ways. First, the quality of the oil is significantly lower than other, lighter forms of oil. This means that it needs to be processed more than competing energy production, raising costs. Many oil sands producers, including Canadian Natural, need US$40 per barrel or more oil prices to break even. Other North American producers, with exposure to higher-quality oil, have breakeven prices down to $20 per barrel or even less.

Because oil sands production needs to be processed more, it must be transported to refineries. Unfortunately, refinery access close to many oil sands facilities is sparse. This forces many producers to pay additional costs to transport their output across provinces, or sometimes even countries, to get their oil ready for market. This is yet an additional cost many competitors don’t need to deal with.

Watch out for this deathblow

Not only must oil sands producers pay more to refine and ship their output, but they’ve been forced to sell at a discount in recent months. “Canadian crude has become the most discounted oil on the planet,” reported The Globe and Mail in November. “Today’s rock-bottom prices are a warning … that the oil sands’ best days are already in the rear-view mirror.”

In its latest quarterly conference call, Canadian Natural management said that it would be halting some oil sands production due to weak selling prices.

Most worryingly are new rules that could render 20% of oil sands production uneconomical. In just 11 months, new marine regulations will drastically reduce the sulfur content that is allowed in shipping fuel, moving to 0.5% from 3.5%. According to the Canadian Energy Research Institute, nearly 600,000 barrels per day of oil sands production (about 20% of all projects) would be shut down due to a lack of profitability.

This major headwind — some would call it a deathblow — is set to crush Canadian Natural, yet few investors seem to be talking about it. While the stock may not hit $0 over the next decade, there’s little doubt that the company is facing its most challenging conditions in its history. Investors beware.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Ryan Vanzo has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

construction workers talk on the job site
Energy Stocks

Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Baytex vs Suncor?

Suncor and Baytex stocks both look like solid companies offering growth and dividends. But which is the better buy?

Read more »

bulb idea thinking
Energy Stocks

3 Incredibly Cheap Energy Stocks to Buy Now

Energy stocks are trending upwards on the back of several key factors. And these three continue to be top cheap…

Read more »

Pumpjack in Alberta Canada
Energy Stocks

Should You Buy Freehold Royalties Stock for its 8% Yield?

Freehold Royalties is a TSX dividend stock that offers shareholders a forward yield of 8%. But is the energy stock…

Read more »

Muscles Drawn On Black board
Energy Stocks

Is Suncor Energy Stock a Good Buy?

Suncor is on a roll in 2024. Are more gains on the way?

Read more »

profit rises over time
Top TSX Stocks

3 Reasons to Buy Enbridge Like There’s No Tomorrow

Have you considered buying Enbridge (TSX:ENB)? Here are 3 reasons to buy Enbridge today for lasting growth and income.

Read more »

oil pump jack under night sky
Energy Stocks

Is CNQ Stock a Buy for its 4.5% Dividend Yield?

CNQ stock is one of the best options out there for dividend growth. But what about value? Let's take a…

Read more »

Pumpjack in Alberta Canada
Energy Stocks

Is Imperial Oil Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

Imperial Oil stock is in a precarious position, so what should investors consider as we head nearer to 2025?

Read more »

construction workers talk on the job site
Energy Stocks

Is Suncor Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

Suncor Energy stock is trading at its decade-high on uncertainty in the oil market. Should you buy, sell, or hold…

Read more »