3 Energy Stocks to Avoid at All Costs in 2020

Stocks like Imperial Oil Ltd. (TSX:IMO)(NYSEMKT:IMO) and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (TSX:CNQ)(NYSE:CNQ) used to be winning investments, but long-term, they’re primed to underperform.

| More on:

Energy stocks are classic boom-or-bust securities. For decades, the energy sector has minted millionaires and destroyed fortunes. If you want to make big money, pay attention to this segment of the market. Just tread carefully, as several factors are radically changing how the industry operates.

While there’s still plenty of opportunity left, there’s a growing consensus that stocks like Imperial Oil Ltd. (TSX:IMO)(NYSEMKT:IMO), Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (TSX:CNQ)(NYSE:CNQ), and Suncor Energy Inc (TSX:SU)(NYSE:SU) are losing bets over the next decade or more. If you own any energy-related stocks, you need to understand what’s going on.

Renewables rising

The most obvious concern is that the three stocks above produce fossil fuels. If you think it’s too early to talk about the rise of renewables, think again.

Sure, it will take decades for renewables to take a leading market position, but they’re well on their way. Renewables already serve more than 10% of global energy production. According to the International Energy Agency, renewables should lead the way for decades to come.

“Renewables are forecast to meet more than 70% of global electricity generation growth, led by solar PV and followed by wind, hydropower, and bioenergy,” the IEA wrote in its latest market analysis and forecast report. “Hydropower remains the largest renewable source, meeting 16% of global electricity demand by 2023, followed by wind (6%), solar PV (4%), and bioenergy (3%).”

While it’s not just renewables (we’ll get to an even bigger problem below), the shifting energy landscape has proven difficult for even the best capital allocators.

Take a look at Exxon Mobil Corporation. Exxon is lauded for its ability to think decades ahead and optimize for shareholder returns. Yet over the past 12 years, the company’s stock has generated negative returns. If Exxon can’t figure out how to produce positive long-term results, it’s not looking promising for the rest of the industry.

Race to the bottom

While renewables will continue to eat into the traditional energy sector, the race to the bottom is the true concern. Imperial Oil, Suncor Energy, and Canadian Natural all have sizable exposure to Canadian oil sands.

Amid a falling cost environment, this is a terrible place to be. Oil sands typically have breakeven levels between US$40 and US$50 per barrel, pushing them into loss-making territory several times in recent years. Looking ahead, conditions are about to worsen.

Take a look at any oil producer and you’ll see rapidly falling costs over the last five years. Companies like Chevron Corporation and Royal Dutch Shell are targeting new shale projects in North America that could break even as low as US$15 per barrel.

Oil sands companies, meanwhile, remain at the top of the industry cost curve. The reason is simple: oil sands have a permanent cost disadvantage.

Oil sands output is typically lower quality versus the rest of North America, and thus requires additional refining. For example, Oil Sands Magazine notes that “bitumen produced from the oil sands requires an intermediate upgrading step for partial removal of the heavy hydrocarbon fractions and conversion into light synthetic crude oil.” Complex refining results in structurally higher costs.

While the rest of the oil industry is dramatically cutting costs to historic levels, oil sands operators such as Imperial Oil, Suncor Energy, and Canadian Natural remain dangerously close to breakeven.

While costs continue to improve, they’re still nowhere close to U.S. shale plays. Long term, these oil sands stocks are in trouble.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Ryan Vanzo has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Dividend Stocks

ETF stands for Exchange Traded Fund
Dividend Stocks

4 Passive Income ETFs to Buy and Hold Forever

These 4 funds are ideal for long-term investors seeking to simplify the process of investing in high-quality, dividend-paying companies while…

Read more »

sale discount best price
Dividend Stocks

2 Delectable Dividend Stocks Down up to 17% to Buy Immediately

These two dividend stocks may be down, but each are making some strong changes for today's investor.

Read more »

Paper Canadian currency of various denominations
Dividend Stocks

2 Top Canadian Dividend Stocks to Buy on a Pullback

These stocks deserve to be on your radar today.

Read more »

ways to boost income
Dividend Stocks

This 10.18% Dividend Stock Is My Pick for Immediate Income

This dividend stock offers an impressive dividend yield, but is that enough for investors to consider long term?

Read more »

Confused person shrugging
Dividend Stocks

Telus: Buy, Sell, or Hold in 2025?

Telus is down 20% in the past year. Is the stock now undervalued?

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

The CRA Is Watching: The Least-Known TFSA Red Flags

If you want to keep your TFSA growing, don't get the CRA on your back. Avoid these pitfalls, and invest…

Read more »

An investor uses a tablet
Dividend Stocks

BCE Stock: A Lukewarm Outlook for 2025

BCE Inc (TSX:BCE) stock has a tepid outlook for 2025.

Read more »

hand stacking money coins
Dividend Stocks

Invest $25,000 in 2 TSX Stocks, Create $1,363.84 in Passive Income

If you're looking for passive income, these two offer that and more while creating even more from returns.

Read more »