Is the S&P 500 a Vicious Value Trap?

Even if S&P 500 stocks are now cheap (and TMF contributor Alex Busson doesn’t think they are), the dollar has never looked so risky.

| More on:

Since Covid-19 broke out, U.S. stocks in the S&P 500 have been annihilated.

The Dow lost all of its post-Trump gains and the Russell 2000 index plunged almost 40% in four weeks. But if you’re thinking now is a good time to buy, you may want to think again.

Despite these losses, U.S. stocks still look massively overvalued in my opinionfor one very good reason:

The dollar cannot stay this high forever

While stock markets crashed, the U.S. dollar surged against virtually all currencies.

Why?

Source: TradingView.com

For starters, big institutions and traders are having to meet ‘margin calls’. That is: pad their accounts with collateral against falling dollar-based assets.

This demand for dollars is only temporary.

Another reason could be the dollar’s reputation as a ‘safe haven’ currency. Historically, when the sky is falling, this is the place to run. But that reputation now looks shaky.

U.S. Federal debts are $23.5 trillion – more than double 2008 levels.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve is pumping trillions of new dollars into the markets.

Even if S&P 500 stocks are now cheap (and I don’t think they are), the dollar has never looked so risky. Buy now and you could suffer a double crash – first in stocks, then in currency.

There are some wonderful U.S. companies. My favourites are Disney, Waste Management, Starbucks. I would love to own these stocks, and I believe a time will come to buy.

However, no matter how far they’ve fallen, I don’t think that time is now.

Where to buy instead?

Currency could play a much bigger role in this crash.

Central banks are experimenting with extreme policies that have never been tried before. So instead of the S&P 500, I’m focusing on emerging markets, whose currencies have already been hit, and could benefit from a falling dollar.

India offers some extraordinary long-term opportunities, because the population is so young. Corporations aren’t saddled with pensions like those in western nations.

India is the only major economy with a growing workforce and increased urbanization. It means more wealth going around the economy. And because cities are growing, productivity is rising too.

What happens in India today or tomorrow, I’m not certain. As for the long term, I expect India to roar with a new wave of prosperity. This is like investing in America back in the late 1970s.

Don’t forget commodity countries, either

Commodities have been clobbered all through this bull run.

Then came the recent oil shock. Again, commodities were kicked while they were down. It’s hard to imagine an area that’s more unloved, battered and bruised.

Which is why I think commodities could have a very bright decade ahead.

One stock I’m watching closely is Lundin Mining (TSX:LUN), a well-run Canadian copper miner with a very strong balance sheet.

Lundin’s liabilities are low, with a debt/equity ratio of 0.06. As I write this, it is even trading at a price/book ratio of 0.60. Broadly speaking, it means this stock could be seriously undervalued. You are effectively getting a dollar of assets for every 60 cents you invest.

And remember: those are Canadian dollars that aren’t being propelled to unsustainable heights. I feel safer there than anywhere in the U.S.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Alex Busson does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. David Gardner owns shares of Starbucks and Walt Disney. Tom Gardner owns shares of Starbucks. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Starbucks and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Waste Management and recommends the following options: long January 2021 $60 calls on Walt Disney and short April 2020 $135 calls on Walt Disney.

More on Investing

Canadian Dollars bills
Dividend Stocks

3 Monthly-Paying Dividend Stocks to Boost Your Passive Income

Given their healthy cash flows and high yields, these three monthly-paying dividend stocks could boost your passive income.

Read more »

ways to boost income
Investing

Are Telus and BCE Stocks a Smart Buy for Canadian Investors?

Telus (TSX:T) and BCE (TSX:BCE) have massive dividend yields, but their shares have been quite sluggish!

Read more »

investment research
Tech Stocks

Is OpenText Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

Is OpenText stock poised for a 2025 comeback? AI ambitions, a 3.8% yield, and cash flow power make it a…

Read more »

Make a choice, path to success, sign
Dividend Stocks

The TFSA Blueprint to Generate $3,695.48 in Yearly Passive Income

The blueprint to generate yearly passive income in a TFSA is to maximize the contribution limits.

Read more »

The virtual button with the letters AI in a circle hovering above a keyboard, about to be clicked by a cursor.
Tech Stocks

Emerging Canadian AI Companies With Big Potential

These tech stocks are paving the way to an AI-filled future, but still offer enough growth ahead for a strong…

Read more »

Young Boy with Jet Pack Dreams of Flying
Tech Stocks

Is Constellation Software Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

CSU stock has long been a strong option for high growth, high value stocks. But are there now too many…

Read more »

rising arrow with flames
Investing

2 Riskier Stocks With High Potential for Canadian Investors in November

Risky stocks such as Well Health Technologies have the potential to provide life-changing long-term returns.

Read more »

hand stacks coins
Dividend Stocks

3 Ultra-High-Yield Dividend Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for a Decade

These three high-yield dividend stocks still have some work to do, but each are in steady areas that are only…

Read more »