Here’s a Canadian Telecom Dilemma

Here’s why the news about a massive deal between two of Canada’s largest telecoms is ushering in the Canadian telecom dilemma.

| More on:

Earlier this week, investors were treated to the first major (and likely largest) M&A announcement of the year. Rogers Communications (TSX:RCI.B)(NYSE:RCI) made an offer for Shaw Communications (TSX:SJR.B)(NYSE:SJR). This is the Canadian telecom dilemma that investors need to navigate.

More about that deal (and why everyone is watching)

The deal includes a cash offering of $40.50 per share to Shaw shareholders. This represents a handsome premium over where Shaw traded just last week. For the Shaw family, most of that compensation would come in the form of Rogers stock as well as two seats on the company board.

Once all is done, Rogers’s already impressive (and massive) wireless segment would consume Shaw’s Freedom Mobile segment. The combined wireless segment would have well over 12 million subscribers and a nationwide network blanketing the country.

Rogers also sees the deal as a necessary one to build out a solid 5G network to all of Canada. The company also sees this as a springboard to continue the trend of falling data rates. Rogers stated the (combined) company would drop $2.5 billion on building a 5G network in western Canada. An additional $3 billion is earmarked towards network and technology upgrades.

The Canadian telecom dilemma

Unfortunately, here’s the problem with Rogers and why this really is a Canadian telecom dilemma.

In short, Canada is huge. But for all that landmass, we have a tiny population. Building a wireless network over large areas requires a lot of capital, which is something only a handful of carriers can do on a national scale. Shaw started Freedom Mobile on the ashes of what was once Wind Mobile and has been investing heavily in growing its network to be a national competitor.

For well over a decade, regulatory bodies have been trying to shore up a solid fourth player in the Canadian telecom market. Wireless auctions set aside spectrum for new and smaller players to bid on. For Shaw, those auctions were nothing short of a buying frenzy for Freedom Mobile. To assume that regulatory bodies will simply shrug at this move by Rogers to ingest Shaw is unlikely.

Shaw is also fiercely competitive with Rogers in the markets where it does have coverage, offering better data allowances, rates, and better customer service. Shaw also boasts contract-free plans, which is something the other telecoms were very reluctant to offer subscribers for years. Those customers may not want to the higher rates associated with Rogers.

To assume that Rogers will keep Shaw’s data caps and rates in place indefinitely is unlikely. Rogers has so far committed to a three-year lock-in period for those existing rates. This would also reduce, if not eliminate both competition and the need to continue to drive data rates lower.

Is this a done deal?

This isn’t the first time that Rogers and Shaw have struck a deal together. The telecoms swapped customers and provinces years ago. Back then, Shaw focused on the western provinces while Rogers fortified itself in Ontario. Unfortunately, this deal is infinitely more complicated and will have lasting effects on the telecom market. Hence the Canadian telecom dilemma I noted above.

The deal is not expected to close until the first half of 2022, as it’s subject to multiple approvals — specifically, the Competition Bureau, CRTC, and Ministry of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development will all weigh in on the deal.

Until that decision comes, I’ll keep enjoying everything that Shaw has to offer, including its juicy monthly dividend.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Demetris Afxentiou owns shares of Shaw Communications. The Motley Fool recommends ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. CL B NV.

More on Dividend Stocks

calculate and analyze stock
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Investors: 3 Dividend Stocks to Consider Buying While They Are Down

These stocks offer attractive dividends right now.

Read more »

data analyze research
Dividend Stocks

Top Canadian Stocks to Buy Right Away With $2,000

These two Canadian stocks are the perfect pairing if you have $2,000 and you just want some easy, safe, awesome…

Read more »

money goes up and down in balance
Dividend Stocks

Take Full Advantage of Your TFSA With These 5 Dividend Stars

Choosing the right dividend stars for your TFSA can be tricky, especially if your goal is to maximize the balance…

Read more »

TFSA (Tax free savings account) acronym on wooden cubes on the background of stacks of coins
Dividend Stocks

The Best Canadian Dividend Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever in a TFSA

These three top dividend stocks are ideal for your TFSA due to their consistent dividend payouts and healthy yields.

Read more »

open vault at bank
Dividend Stocks

1 Magnificent TSX Dividend Stock, Down 10%, to Buy and Hold for a Lifetime

A recent dip makes this Big Bank stock an attractive buying opportunity.

Read more »

Canadian Dollars bills
Dividend Stocks

2 Incredibly Cheap Canadian Growth Stocks to Buy Before It’s Too Late

Buying cheap stocks needs patience and a long-term investment approach. Only then can they give you extraordinary returns.

Read more »

senior relaxes in hammock with e-book
Dividend Stocks

Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for Passive Income

Want to generate a juicy passive income that can last for decades? Here are three stocks every investor needs to…

Read more »

exchange traded funds
Dividend Stocks

1 Top High-Yield Dividend ETF to Buy to Generate Passive Income

An ETF designed as a long-term foundational holding pays generous monthly dividends.

Read more »