Here’s a Canadian Telecom Dilemma

Here’s why the news about a massive deal between two of Canada’s largest telecoms is ushering in the Canadian telecom dilemma.

| More on:

Earlier this week, investors were treated to the first major (and likely largest) M&A announcement of the year. Rogers Communications (TSX:RCI.B)(NYSE:RCI) made an offer for Shaw Communications (TSX:SJR.B)(NYSE:SJR). This is the Canadian telecom dilemma that investors need to navigate.

More about that deal (and why everyone is watching)

The deal includes a cash offering of $40.50 per share to Shaw shareholders. This represents a handsome premium over where Shaw traded just last week. For the Shaw family, most of that compensation would come in the form of Rogers stock as well as two seats on the company board.

Once all is done, Rogers’s already impressive (and massive) wireless segment would consume Shaw’s Freedom Mobile segment. The combined wireless segment would have well over 12 million subscribers and a nationwide network blanketing the country.

Rogers also sees the deal as a necessary one to build out a solid 5G network to all of Canada. The company also sees this as a springboard to continue the trend of falling data rates. Rogers stated the (combined) company would drop $2.5 billion on building a 5G network in western Canada. An additional $3 billion is earmarked towards network and technology upgrades.

The Canadian telecom dilemma

Unfortunately, here’s the problem with Rogers and why this really is a Canadian telecom dilemma.

In short, Canada is huge. But for all that landmass, we have a tiny population. Building a wireless network over large areas requires a lot of capital, which is something only a handful of carriers can do on a national scale. Shaw started Freedom Mobile on the ashes of what was once Wind Mobile and has been investing heavily in growing its network to be a national competitor.

For well over a decade, regulatory bodies have been trying to shore up a solid fourth player in the Canadian telecom market. Wireless auctions set aside spectrum for new and smaller players to bid on. For Shaw, those auctions were nothing short of a buying frenzy for Freedom Mobile. To assume that regulatory bodies will simply shrug at this move by Rogers to ingest Shaw is unlikely.

Shaw is also fiercely competitive with Rogers in the markets where it does have coverage, offering better data allowances, rates, and better customer service. Shaw also boasts contract-free plans, which is something the other telecoms were very reluctant to offer subscribers for years. Those customers may not want to the higher rates associated with Rogers.

To assume that Rogers will keep Shaw’s data caps and rates in place indefinitely is unlikely. Rogers has so far committed to a three-year lock-in period for those existing rates. This would also reduce, if not eliminate both competition and the need to continue to drive data rates lower.

Is this a done deal?

This isn’t the first time that Rogers and Shaw have struck a deal together. The telecoms swapped customers and provinces years ago. Back then, Shaw focused on the western provinces while Rogers fortified itself in Ontario. Unfortunately, this deal is infinitely more complicated and will have lasting effects on the telecom market. Hence the Canadian telecom dilemma I noted above.

The deal is not expected to close until the first half of 2022, as it’s subject to multiple approvals — specifically, the Competition Bureau, CRTC, and Ministry of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development will all weigh in on the deal.

Until that decision comes, I’ll keep enjoying everything that Shaw has to offer, including its juicy monthly dividend.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Demetris Afxentiou owns shares of Shaw Communications. The Motley Fool recommends ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. CL B NV.

More on Dividend Stocks

bulb idea thinking
Dividend Stocks

5 No-Brainer Dividend Stocks to Buy Right Now for Less Than $1,000

These TSX stocks consistently pay and increase their dividends regardless of market conditions, making them no-brainer investments.

Read more »

Canadian Dollars bills
Dividend Stocks

Invest $15,000 in This Dividend Stock for $797 in Passive Income

Bank of Nova Scotia stock is a good idea for placing long-term capital and earning passive income, especially on pullbacks.

Read more »

a man relaxes with his feet on a pile of books
Dividend Stocks

Is Fairfax Financial Stock a Buy for its 1.1% Dividend Yield?

Is Fairfax worth adding to your portfolio?

Read more »

Blocks conceptualizing Canada's Tax Free Savings Account
Dividend Stocks

How to Use Your TFSA to Earn $5,000 Per Year in Tax-Free Income

Adding these two top dividend stocks could help you create a reliable income-generating portfolio within your TFSA.

Read more »

woman looks out at horizon
Dividend Stocks

Is Manulife Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

Manulife stock (TSX:MFC) has had one heck of a year. But is that set to continue in 2025 and beyond?

Read more »

Canadian dollars in a magnifying glass
Dividend Stocks

Retirees: Expect a 2.7% CPP Inflation Boost Next Year

A 2.7% inflation bump means more nominal income. Investing in ETFs like the BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (TSX:ZDV) provides a…

Read more »

up arrow on wooden blocks
Dividend Stocks

3 Blue-Chip Dividend Stocks Every Canadian Should Own

These are large-cap TSX stocks with fundamentally strong businesses and growing earnings bases that support their distributions.

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

Is Granite REIT stock a buy for its 4.3% dividend yield?

Granite REIT stock appears to be a good buy for monthly income and long-term price appreciation at current levels.

Read more »