$26 Billion Merger: Can Rogers (TSX:RCI.B) Clear the Roadblocks?

The proposed $26 billion merger in the telco industry hangs in the balance after the Competition Bureau blocked the transaction.

| More on:
investment research

Image source: Getty Images

Potential partners Rogers Communications (TSX:RCI.B)(NYSE:RCI) and Shaw Communications have postponed the completion of their business combination to July 31, 2022. While the companies asserted their commitment to the $26 billion merger in the telco industry, they need to clear the roadblocks first.

On March 24, 2022, the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) approved Rogers’s takeover of Shaw, but the deal is subject to several conditions and safeguards. It was a win, nonetheless, and one less roadblock. However, the parties opposing the deal received support from Canada’s Competition Bureau.

New twist

Rogers and Shaw will face the Competition Tribunal after the federal regulator filed applications to block the transaction. On May 9, 2022, their share prices fell 4.14% and 7.16%, respectively. As of this writing, Rogers trade at $64.81 per share and is up 8.39% year to date. It pays a decent 3.10% dividend.

The Competition Bureau said that after a rigorous investigation, it found that the competition between Rogers and Shaw has already declined. It added that harm will continue, if not worsen. Competition Commissioner Matthew Boswell said, “We are taking action to block this merger to preserve competition and choice for an essential service that Canadians expect to be affordable and high quality.”

Not a deal buster

Many analysts don’t see the latest twist as a deal buster for Canada’s third-largest telco. Drew McReynolds from RBC Capital Markets believes that Rogers will obtain approval eventually. National Bank of Canada Financial Markets’ analyst Adam Shine said the chances of a Rogers takeover are still more than 50%.

However, Mr. Shine added that the review process could drag on for months. Rogers and Shaw will file their response with the Competition Tribunal 45 days from the applications, then the bureau must respond within 14 days. The third and final hurdle is the Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada (ISEDC).

No full takeover

Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne is against a full takeover, because it’s fundamentally incompatible with the policies of the Trudeau government. Thus, Rogers sees Shaw’s Freedom Mobile as the key to a successful merger, and unloading the wireless division could address anti-trust concerns.

Quebecor is a potential taker if the company has plans to expand beyond Quebec. Its CEO, Pierre Karl Péladeau, said, “We believe that these alternatives position us very favourably, as governmental and administrative authorities, including the CRTC, pursue the public policy of establishing the conditions for true competition in wireless services in Canada.”

Globalive Capital also has an interest in acquiring Freedom Mobile. The company recently entered a spectrum and network sharing agreement with TELUS, although the latter won’t have any financial investment. Its Chairman, Anthony Lacavera, “TELUS and we believe that we are a strong remedy partner for Rogers to get the Shaw merger approved.”

However, some sources say that BCE and TELUS want the federal government and the Competition Bureau to block Quebecor’s purchase of Freedom Mobile.

Finding an effective remedy

According to Mr. Boswell, the divestiture proposal by Rogers and Shaw isn’t an effective remedy for the competitive harm. But for Mr. Shine of National Bank, it doesn’t make sense for the bureau to reject the proposal. Meanwhile, the deal hangs in the balance.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Christopher Liew has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. CL B NV and TELUS CORPORATION.

More on Dividend Stocks

ETF stands for Exchange Traded Fund
Dividend Stocks

How to Earn $2,000 in Passive Income in 2025 With Less Than $51,000 in Savings

You can invest in Canadian high yield stocks via the Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Yield Dividend ETF (TSX:VDY).

Read more »

monthly desk calendar
Dividend Stocks

This 7.8% Dividend Stock Pays Out Every Month

Not all monthly dividend stocks are created equal. And this top stock is certainly a strong choice for passive income.

Read more »

A worker gives a business presentation.
Dividend Stocks

Is TMX Group Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for 2025?

TMX Group (TSX:X) stock has been a consistent wealth-builder, generating 4,630% in total returns since 2002. Should you buy, sell,…

Read more »

Man data analyze
Dividend Stocks

2 Deeply Undervalued Dividend Stocks to Buy in November

Here are two stocks that I view as deeply undervalued this November.

Read more »

Dividend Stocks

The 2 Best Canadian Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy Now

Blue-chip stocks can be some of the best stocks to have in any portfolio. But when they're trending upwards, investors…

Read more »

Canadian dollars in a magnifying glass
Dividend Stocks

Here Are My Top 3 Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

These top dividends stocks have consistently paid and increased their dividends. Further, this trend will continue.

Read more »

dividends can compound over time
Dividend Stocks

Want a 7% Yield? The 3 TSX Stocks to Buy Today

These TSX stocks are offering high yields of over 7%, making them attractive for investors seeking steady passive income.

Read more »

how to save money
Dividend Stocks

The Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy With $200 Right Now

These smartest dividend stocks can consistently pay and increase their dividends in the coming years, irrespective of the macro uncertainty.

Read more »